http://shotbeak.disqus.com/enThu, 05 Nov 2009 15:51:21 -0000http://shotbeak.com/2009/10/31/twitter-lists-tagging-humanity/#comment-21968910<p>Yep, totally agree. </p>Joe LazarusThu, 05 Nov 2009 15:51:21 -0000http://shotbeak.com/2009/10/31/twitter-lists-tagging-humanity/#comment-21663943<p>Another interesting side-effect is that popular people get listed and more "defined", like Mashable - <a href="http://twitter.com/mashable/lists/memberships" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/mashable/lists/memberships">http://twitter.com/mashable...</a>.</p><p>It is an interesting concept. I wonder if it can be extrapolated to something like quantum science. The more observers, the more defined a "state" is, if you get what I mean.</p><p>Anyway, will definitely be interesting to see where this goes!</p>shotbeakMon, 02 Nov 2009 08:33:58 -0000http://shotbeak.com/2009/10/31/twitter-lists-tagging-humanity/#comment-21524311<p>Been thinking about how we can profile a person's tacit knowledge for a while now. This is actually an interesting approach, as the aggregate of the lists that a user is in could provide a rough estimate of what his/her tacit knowledge may be.</p><p>This is still far from comprehensive, but it does offer a different perspective as, as you mentioned, this is not the person profiling himself... other people are doing it.</p><p>Could actually be interesting to compare others' perception of you with your own.</p>Henno GousSun, 01 Nov 2009 10:28:31 -0000